Commercial Energy Infomation Deregulation Update!

March 2, 2012

Solar Energy is Easy & We Do All The Work. YOU Get All The Savings!

Solar Energy is Easy

We do all the work. YOU get all the savings!

NOW is the time to GO SOLAR!

  • Get a 30% Federal tax credit on the cost of your Solar System
  • Get over 20% back in Utility Rebates
  • Add at least the net cost of the system to your home’s value, plus a 10% annual return on your investment via energy savings!*
  • As energy prices go up, so do your savings!

You need to know:

  • The Federal Tax Credit ends in 2016.
  • California rebate rates decrease every 6 months by about 20%
  • Time is of the essence for your greatest savings

The benefits of Solar energy extend to those around you:

  • Reduce your pollution footprint–equivalent to planting a small forest.
  • Reduce our dependance on non-renewable and foreign resources
  • Self-sufficiency

Now is definitely the time to Go Solar!

Orion will make your solar installation simple.
John Krueger
Description: OSR Logo
John Krueger
Manufacturer of PV Mounting Systems
2917 Vail Ave.
Commerce, CA 90040
U.S.A
Here’s the updated version of the Jupiter series ground mount system.
We Make Solar Installation Simple!
 
New Energy Provider & Extremely PowefulAlso, check out the brand new Viridian 18 min video presentation:

www.viridianpresentation.info Any Question Call Today

818 428 5147 Johnny K

January 29, 2012

California Pricing PV Systems and Financing Ideas & Orion Solar Racking

Pricing PV Systems and Financing Ideas & Orion Solar Racking

The cost of a PV system depends on the system size, equipment options (panels and inverters), permitting costs, and labor costs. Prices vary depending on other factors as well, such as whether your home is new, where the system is installed on your premise, the PV manufacturer, and other factors.

For example, the total average cost of an installed residential PV system under the California Solar Initiative is $8.70 per Watt (including installation, as of January 2011). That translates to about $34,800 for a four-kilowatt system, the average size of a residential installation. To see real average cost data for solar projects installed near you, visit the Find a Contractor page on California Solar Statistics.

Because of the declining rebates in the California solar programs, the sooner you install your system, the better your incentive and rebate will be.  Click here to view the current rebate levels at the CSI Trigger Tracker.

Depending on your pre-installation electricity usage, you can expect rates of return between 9% and 14% on your PV installation.  Please see Calculators to estimate the full cost of your solar system.  For example, using the Clean Power Estimator, a south-facing three-kilowatt system installed at a 30-degree angle on a single-family home with a utility bill of $180 per month in San Francisco would cost a customer an estimated $19,282 with a payback period of 12 years.

  • Is there a buy-out provision?
  • What happens if the contractor goes out of business?
  • Is there opportunity to pay some up front and some later?

Financing a Solar Energy System & Orion Solar Racking

Solar customers have multiple options when financing their solar energy systems:

Home Equity Loans – Many customers go through their commercial lenders to finance their solar energy systems, and home equity loans have been the most common method for homeowners to purchase their solar systems.  To find out more about home equity loans, you can contact your local providers, though many solar contractors have partnerships with existing lenders.

Power Purchase Agreements – Under a “PPA,” a third party owns and maintains the customer solar system, selling the kilowatt-hours back to the customer. Thus, customers who opt for a solar PPAtypically have low capital costs and pay only for the electricity their solar systems generate.  Both SolarTech and the Rahus Institute offer helpful guides and additional information on solar PPAs.

Solar Leases – By leasing a solar system, customers can get the benefits of owning a solar system without the capital costs.  Solar customers opting for solar leases simply rent the solar system from a company as they would any other home appliance while earning the benefits from the electricity the system produces.  Solar leases are attractive options for home or business owners that plan to at their business or office for less than five years. For more reading, Mother Jones Magazine has an excellent February 2010 article titled: “If You Can’t Afford to Buy a PV System, Consider Renting One“.

Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) – Solar customers likewise may have the option to finance their solar systems through their local governments.  Local governments can create property tax finance districts to issue loans for energy efficiency and renewable energy such as solar PV systems.  PACE allows local governments to provide low-cost, 20-year loans to eligible property owners seeking to install these technologies. The solar customer then pays more on the annual property tax bill to repay the loan. The loans are permanently fixed to real property, so that residents need not worry about their system’s break-even point and can pass the loan payments on to subsequent buyers of the property.  Renewable Funding offers helpful additional information about PACE, and presently PACE programs are in place in the following communities:

Orion Solar Racking

Note that affordable housing customers that wish to deploy solar systems have different pricing mechanisms and incentives with the California Solar Initiative through the Single Family Affordable Solar Housing (SASH) and Multi-Family Affordable Solar Housing Programs (MASH). For more information and program eligibility, please see the Affordable Housing section.

The California Solar Initiative Incentives Explained & Orion Solar Racking

Because of the triggering mechanism in the California Solar Initiative, as explained below, the sooner you purchase and install your system, the better your incentive and rebate will be.  Incentive amounts will likewise vary depending on your solar system size, system performance, customer class, utility provider, and program deployment phase.  Click here to view the current incentive and tariff levels.

The California Solar Initiative offers financial incentives for solar installations based on the expected performance of a given solar installation. The expected performance is derived from the size of the solar array, and also takes into consideration the angle and location of the system installation. For larger systems, the incentive is based on the actual performance of the system over the first five years.

The incentive level available to a given project is determined by currently available incentive in each utility territory for each customer class. The CSI was designed so that the incentive level decreases over ten steps, after which it goes to $0, as the total demand for solar energy systems grows.

The CPUC divided the overall goal of 1,750 megawatts by these ten declining steps. Each step has megawatts allocated to each Program Administrator and customer class, residential and non-residential (a combination of commercial and government/non-profit). Once the total number of megawatts for each step is reached within a particular customer class, the Program Administrator moves to the next step and offers a lower incentive level for that class. Therefore, high commercial demand in SCE’s territory will not lower the incentive level offered to PG&E’s residential customers, and so on. Figure 1 offers a visual explanation of the increasing megawatt installations and decreasing incentive levels over the life of the program. The orange box in each “Incentive Step Level” represents the available megawatts at that incentive value. The yellow box represents the cumulative installed megawatts as the program proceeds through the steps.

The California Solar Initiative pays solar consumers their incentive either all-at-once for smaller systems, or over the course of five years for larger systems. The program’s two incentive payment types are:

  • Expected Performance-Based Buy-Down, or EPBB:        In 2008-9, systems smaller than 50kW in capacity can receive a one-time, up-front incentive based on expected performance, and calculated by equipment ratings and installation factors (geographic location, tilt and shading). EPBB payments are provided on a $ per watt basis. EPBB is available for systems under 30 KW after 2010. Systems eligible for EPBB can choose to opt-in to the PBI system described below.
  • Performance Based Incentive, or PBI: The PBI pays out an incentive, based on actual kWh production, over a period of five years. PBI payments are provided on a $ per kilowatt-hour basis. As of 2010 all systems over 30 kW must be on PBI, though sized system can elect to take PBI.

Other Incentives & Orion Solar Racking

Solar customers should also check with their local government agencies for additional programs, incentives, or information. See the Solar Incentives by Utility page for a full list of California solar programs, or click here to Find Your Utility.

 

   Orion Racking offers complete racking solutions to its customers with excellent support with more than 10 years of Solar Energy experience. Orion’s engineers can provide assistance with the design of your next solar project to maximize the output and efficiency, help you with the product selection for a complete solar system and guide you through the installation process for saving time and labor.

ARRA – US Compliance (Made In The USA)

2.       Over 70% Pre-Assembled means … 25% Less Labor

3.       Our shared rail system means … 25 – 45% Less Material

4.       Helps Improve ROI to maximize performance

5.       Easy & Fast Installation

6.       As low as $0.11 per watt

 

Please take a minute to review the enclosed brochures for a variety of solar racking solutions. For more information about ordering samples visit www.Orionsolarracking.com  or give us a call at (818) 428 5147  for free consultation for your next solar project.

 

Orion will make your solar installation simple.

John Krueger
Description: OSR Logo
John Krueger
Manufacturer of PV Mounting Systems
2917 Vail Ave.
Commerce, CA 90040
U.S.A
Here’s the updated version of the Jupiter series ground mount system.
     We Make Solar Installation Simple!

 

November 4, 2011

SCE – Renewable Auction Mechanism (RAM) Solar Farms Business Opportunity & Element Power Group

The Southern California Edison (SCE) Renewable Auction Mechanism (RAM) program is open to all RPS eligible technologies not greater than 20 MW and interconnected within any of the service territories of SCE, Pacific Gas & Electric or San Diego Gas & Electric. This program contributes to SCE’s compliance with California’s goals for renewable energy procurement. The program follows the requirements established by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC).

On September 21, 2011, SCE announced (PDF) the launch of the 2011 RAM RFO. As part of an effort to streamline the RFO process, the SCE RAM RFO will be conducted using an online RFO management website provided by Accion Group, the independent evaluator for the 2011 RAM RFO. Please visit the RFO website for more information, to submit an Offer, or to ask a question.

SCE Interconnection Map

Southern California Edison’s Interconnection Map provides SCE system data pertinent to DG developers searching for possible interconnection locations on the SCE distribution system. This map includes the general locations of SCE distribution circuits, substations, and subtransmission systems along with the associated circuit/substation/system voltage, available capacity, and current and queued DG interconnections amounts.

The distribution circuit and substation map includes the following data:

  • The “Available Capacity” shown for distribution circuits is the amount of generation that can be interconnected to a distribution circuit that will likely have minimal impact to the system. This value is based on the Rule 21 and WDAT 15% Fast Track screen. The “Maximum Available Capacity” shown for distribution circuits indicates the maximum amount of generation that can be interconnected on a specific distribution circuit. This assumes that sufficient system upgrades are in place, which may result in high interconnection costs for the developer. In addition, the map indicates those distribution circuits (“green” in color) that are considered “preferred” areas for interconnection. These locations are highly loaded areas on the SCE distribution system that currently have low DG penetration levels (less than 2.0MW). Based on initial screening studies, locating your project inside one of the identified areas could potentially minimize your costs of interconnection to the SCE system.
  • The “Maximum Available Capacity” shown at the substation level indicates the maximum amount of generation that can be interconnected to a specific distribution substation. This value accounts for all currently interconnected and queued generation on the specific circuits served from that substation. This assumes that sufficient system upgrades are in place, which may result in high interconnection costs for the developer.

The subtransmission system map includes the following data:

  • The “Maximum Available Capacity” shown for subtransmission systems indicates the maximum amount of generation that can be interconnected in a specific subtransmission system. This assumes that sufficient system upgrades are in place, which may result in high interconnection costs for the developer.

Note: Actual interconnection costs will be determined from further studies which consider specific project location, size, and application date relative to other projects in the same vicinity.

To view the subtransmission, substation and distribution circuit interconnection map in Google Earth, download the KMZ file. Note that you will need Google Earth to view the map.

I am representing ORION Racking, Next Solar System and Element Power Group as a newly representing companies.

http://orionsolarracking.com/
 
http://nextsolarsystems.com/
 
http://elementpowergroup.com/
 
http://www.getdeco.com/
 
They are all acting as a separate entity, but they are like brothers… help each other (not a must, but they can).
 

Element Power Group
John Krueger
818 428 5147
John@ElementControls.Com
www.ElementPowerGroup.Com
Element Power Group Development Solutions. . .
Go Green c Reduce Your Energy Costs
Commercial Energy Consultant for WattControls
Hospitality | Commercial | Municipalities | Schools | Office

April 1, 2011

National Gas & Electric Inc, Seeking Land Or Rooftops Anywhere In CA – Solar Projects

Hi John, Hope this will help your Clients and thanks for your questions

We are actively seeking land or rooftops anywhere in CA in the service territory of any of the big 3 utilities (PG&E, SDG&E, or SCE).  Attached is the utility service map and the site lease we use for Feed In Tariff projects.

We need to get leases signed for at least 50-100 projects of 1.5 MW per location.  It takes ~300,000 square feet for one of these projects, either on rooftop or land.  We’ll pay $18,000 per year per 1.5 MW x 20 years (no escalator on the lease payment).  This is reflected in the site lease for FIT projects, attached.  Go get a bunch of leases signed, because we have funding approval right now for as many of these as we can get!

When exactly does the Lessor begin receiving payments for rent? Do payments begin when the EES goes into operation or is it after the first year of operation? [SunShine ***] one month in arrears, after the EES goes into operation and begins receiving payments from the utility.
Also I didn’t see any language in the site lease regarding a security fence or monitoring system. Should there be?[SunShine ***] it’s in the revised version of the lease.

300,000 sq ft = ~ 7 acres for 1.5mw solar[SunShine ***] correct
1500kw x 100 sq ft (per kw) = 150,000 sqft of solar    [SunShine ***] this does not take into account tilting the arrays for greater output and the setback of the tilted arrays for shading mitigation.  If it’s on a rooftop there are additional setbacks for fire lanes around the perimeter of the roof, skylights, HVAC equipment, avoiding shading from trees, and other unusable space on the roof.  300,000 square feet is probably more than what is needed, but we’re being conservative.
Looks like a factor of 50% of actual land space is being used for the total amount of installed solar on the site lease properties. I’m assuming that iWhy is there a maximum size of 200 acres or 75 MW’s?  [SunShine ***] actually the maximum is 20 MW for the programs we are willing to pursue in CA at this time.  And, it takes up to 10 acres per MW, hence the 200 acres.  Also, where did the 300,000 sq ft minimum req which is closer to 7 acres come from?  [SunShine ***] It could be much less than that, which is why we’re looking for up to 300,000 sq feet.  With fire lanes, HVAC, skylights, shading from trees on parts of the roof, etc., we may need 300,000 to get 200,000 usable roof space.  This isn’t realistic for most roof top applications but figuring 25 sq ft per panel including tilt up shading spacing and 280 watt panels I come up with only 134,000 sq ft necessary for our 1.5 MW installation.  This is far more feasible for available roof tops in CA.  [SunShine ***] Agreed, but it The only issue I can see is the weight load capacity.  That’s where the Lumeta peel & stick PowerPly 400’s would be a great fit.  We can lay the 4X8 panels flat and only need 120,000 sq ft for a 1.5 MW project.  The price point is higher but the labor costs will offset when we’re talking that quantity of panels.[SunShine ***] Lumeta is not an option at this time, as our funding source will not fund anything other than a few select panels they’ve approved.

Does this fund investor require the installation of a specific panel?  [SunShine ***] Yes. Thoughts?[SunShine ***] After we complete several of these projects, we will likely get the green light from 2 other funding sources that are monitoring our progress.  These other funding sources are not as restrictive on the types of equipment we select.
s for means of egress and ally ways to access and service the installed panels. Im going to use this number for factoring in estimated rent payments for the property owners.[SunShine

— Why is there a maximum size of 200 acres or 75 MW’s?  [SunShine ***] actually the maximum is 20 MW for the programs we are willing to pursue in CA at this time.  And, it takes up to 10 acres per MW, hence the 200 acres.  Also, where did the 300,000 sq ft minimum req which is closer to 7 acres come from?  [SunShine ***] It could be much less than that, which is why we’re looking for up to 300,000 sq feet.  With fire lanes, HVAC, skylights, shading from trees on parts of the roof, etc., we may need 300,000 to get 200,000 usable roof space.  This isn’t realistic for most roof top applications but figuring 25 sq ft per panel including tilt up shading spacing and 280 watt panels I come up with only 134,000 sq ft necessary for our 1.5 MW installation.  This is far more feasible for available roof tops in CA.  [SunShine***] Agreed, but it The only issue I can see is the weight load capacity.  That’s where the Lumeta peel & stick PowerPly 400’s would be a great fit.  We can lay the 4X8 panels flat and only need 120,000 sq ft for a 1.5 MW project.  The price point is higher but the labor costs will offset when we’re talking that quantity of panels.[SunShine***] Lumeta is not an option at this time, as our funding source will not fund anything other than a few select panels they’ve approved.

Does this fund investor require the installation of a specific panel?  [SunShine ***] Yes. Thoughts?[SunShine****] After we complete several of these projects, we will likely get the green light from 2 other funding sources that are monitoring our progress.  These other funding sources are not as restrictive on the types of equipment we select.

Thank You

John Krueger
Element Power Group
Energy Consulting Firm
E-Mail For More Info Today
818 428 5147

ElementPowerGroup@gmail.com

WEB SITES:

http://www.nextsolarsystems.com

http://www.elementcontrols.com

http://orionsolarracking.com

http://www.eco-genenergy.com

image 2298488233-1

March 12, 2011

National Gas And Electric Inc – New Jersey SREC Market (All Of New Jersey )

New Jersey SREC Market
New Jersey has the most robust SREC market in the nation. In 2009 the state eclipsed the 100 MW mark for solar capacity installed. The large supply of solar generators in the state is eclipsed by an even greater demand for solar. In the 2010 energy year, the state of New Jersey will likely need over 200 MW of installed capacity to meet the state requirement.
Pricing:
SREC Auction – Auction closing prices history
Other States in which New Jersey facilities are eligible:
NJ facilities only eligible in NJ.
States eligible for NJ Market: Only NJ
Eligibility Period: Installations can generate NJ SRECs for a maximum of 15 years
Energy Year: June 1 to May 31
Tracking Platform: GAT
Solar Requirement: Reaching 5,316,000 SRECs in 2026
SACP: Declining 2.5% per year for at least the next eight years. The BPU will be required to determine the SACP in future years and possible consider increases in the SACP.
Meter Readings: Facilities less than 10kW may use estimated generation based on the PV Watts calculator. All other facilitities must report monthly meter readings.

New Jersey Residential ave home $40,000 for a 7 kw solar system,  They put a downpayment on a loan of 10% =$4,000 they will get 7 x1.2 = 8 solar renewable energy credits ( SREC ) per year which sells in N.J. for $653 per srec = 8x$653 = $5224 per year for 15 years on top of that they also receive a 30% tax credit = which they can take out over 5 years of 30% of $40,000 =$12,000

$5,224 x15 years +$12,000 =$90,000 +interest on a $36,00 loan of $3,000 over 10 years =$93,00 for a $36,000 loan

This Is A No Brainer

Thank You
National Gas And Electric Inc – Element Power Group
John Krueger
818 428 5147
John@ElementControls.Com
http://www.ElementPowerGroup.Com
Element Power Group Development Solutions. . .
Go Green… Reduce Your Energy Costs
Commercial Energy Consultant for WattControls
Hospitality | Commercial | Municipalities | Schools | Office

  • Location: All Of New Jersey
  • it’s NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests

image 2261767900-0 image 2261767900-1

January 28, 2011

Next Solar Systems – What Is Carbon Credit? Why It Matters Now

What Is Carbon Credit?

In step with the dramatic rise in C02 emissions and other pollutants in recent years, a variety of new financial markets have emerged, offering businesses key incentives — aside from taxes and other punitive measures — to slow down overall emissions growth and, ideally, global warming itself.

 A key feature of these markets is emissions trading, or cap-and-trade schemes, which allow companies to buy or sell “credits” that collectively bind all participating companies to an overall emissions limit. While markets operate for specific pollutants such as greenhouse gases and acid rain, by far the biggest emissions market is for carbon. In 2007, the trade market for C02 credits hit $60 billion worldwide — almost double the amount from 2006.

 Size of global carbon credit market: Approximately $60 billion

Amount of C02 the United States traded in 2007: Nearly 23 million metric ton

 Amount of C02 the EU traded in 2007:  More than 1.6 billion metric tons

How It Works

Emissions limits and trading rules vary country by country, so each emissions-trading market operates differently. For nations that have signed the Kyoto Protocol, which holds each country to its own C02 limit, greenhouse gas-emissions trading is mandatory. In the United States, which did not sign the environmental agreement, corporate participation is voluntary for emissions schemes such as the Chicago Climate Exchange. Yet a few general principles apply to each type of market.

Under a basic cap-and-trade scheme, if a company’s carbon emissions fall below a set allowance, that company can sell the difference — in the form of credits — to other companies that exceed their limits. Another fast-growing voluntary model is carbon offsets. In this global market, a set of middlemen companies, called offset firms, estimate a company’s emissions and then act as brokers by offering opportunities to invest in carbon-reducing projects around the world. Unlike carbon trading, offsetting isn’t yet government regulated in most countries; it’s up to buyers to verify a project’s environmental worth. In theory, for every ton of C02 emitted, a company can buy certificates attesting that the same amount of greenhouse gas was removed from the atmosphere through renewable energy projects such as tree planting.

Why It Matters Now

 Industry watchers say carbon markets will continue to grow at a fast clip — especially in the United States, where Fortune 500 powerhouses such as DuPont, Ford, and IBM are voluntarily capping and trading their emissions. Even though a national cap on carbon emissions doesn’t yet exist in the United States, most consider it inevitable, and legislators are already pushing the issue in Congress.

It’s not just governments who are demanding emissions compliance — consumers want it, too. The commitment a company makes to curb its pollutant output is an increasingly public aspect of strategy. More and more employees are taking these factors into account when deciding where to work. A recent study from MonsterTRAK found that 80 percent of young professionals want their work to impact the environment in a positive way, and 92 percent prefer to work for an environmentally friendly company.

Why It Matters to You

Why It Matters to You Let’s say a company can’t afford to modify its operations to reduce C02. Purchasing carbon credits or offsets buys it time to figure out how to operate within C02 limits. For others, it can be a cost-effective tool to help lower emissions while earning public praise for the effort. Each credit a company buys on the Chicago Climate Exchange — usually for about $2 — means another company will remove the equivalent of one metric ton of carbon.

The Advantages

 The Advantages Companies in different industries face dramatically different costs to lower their emissions. A market-based approach allows companies to take carbon-reducing measures that everyone can afford. “The private sector is better at developing diversified approaches to manage the costs and risks [of reducing emissions],” says Jesse Fahnestock, spokesman at Swedish power company Vattenfall, which is a member of a global Combat Climate Change

coalition. Reducing emissions and lowering energy consumption is usually good for the core business. For example, in 1997 British energy company BP committed to bring its emissions down to 10 percent below 1990 levels. After taking simple steps like tightening valves, changing light bulbs, and improving operations efficiency, BP implemented an internal cap-and-trade scheme and met its emissions goal by the end of 2001 — nine years ahead of schedule. Using the combined C02 reduction strategy, BP reported saving about $650 million.

 Then there’s the long-term investment angle: Buying into the carbon market boom now suggests significant dividends later on. Carbon credits are relatively cheap now, but their value will likely rise, giving companies another reason to participate.

The Disadvantages

 The Disadvantages As with any financial market, emissions traders are vulnerable to significant risk and volatility. The EU’s trading scheme (EU-ETS), for instance, issued so many permits between 2005 and 2007 that it flooded the market. Supply soared and carbon prices bottomed out, removing incentives for companies to trade. Enforcement of trading rules can be just as unpredictable, though Fahnestock says the EU is working to correct the problems.

Carbon offsets have their own drawbacks, which reflect a fast-growing and unregulated market. Some offset firms in the United States and abroad have been caught selling offsets for normal operations that do not actually take any additional C02 out of the atmosphere, such as pumping C02 into oil wells to force out the remaining crude. In 2008 the Climate Group, the International Emissions Trading Association, and the World Economic Forum will work to develop a Voluntary Carbon Standard to verify that offsetting projects are beyond business-as-usual and have lasting environmental value.

 The lack of offset regulations has also made marketing problematic. Recently, companies have taken to declaring themselves “carbon neutral.” But until the Federal Trade Commission determines the guidelines for such terms, it’s unclear which companies actually merit the distinction. Already Vail Resorts, the organizers of the Academy Awards, and other organizations have taken heat for touting their investments in carbon offset projects that were not entirely environmentally sound.

Key Players

Bank of America is a leader in carbon-reduction strategies. The bank recently launched a $20 billion, 10-year initiative to finance emission-reduction projects, invest in green technology, and facilitate carbon-credit trading.

 BP is among the most well-known companies to implement an internal cap-and-trade system. The company assigned its 150 units an emissions quota and allowed them to buy and sell carbon credits among themselves.

The European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS) is the mandatory cap-and-trade program for the EU.

The Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) is a U.S. carbon-trading scheme in which companies make a voluntary but legally binding commitment to meet emissions targets.

How to Talk About It

 It Cap-and-trade scheme: A market approach to reducing greenhouse gases that works by setting emissions targets. Governments or businesses that reduce their carbon outputs in excess of the target can sell the difference to those who produce more than the limit. This is the favored solution of many business groups.

MACs: Marginal abatement costs refer to the cost of cutting C02 emission, which varies from country to country and industry to industry.

Free-market environmentalism: This theory holds that the free market, which offers economic incentives, is the best tool to address global warming. This view goes against the traditional approach to environmentalism, which looks to government regulation to prevent environmental destruction.

Thank You

Element Power Group
John Krueger
818 428 5147
John@ElementControls.Com
www.ElementPowerGroup.Com

Element Power Group Development Solutions. . .

Get Green Certified… Reduce Your Energy Costs

Commercial Energy Consultant for WattControls

Hospitality | Commercial | Municipalities | Schools | Office

image 2173563179-0 image 2173563179-1

January 20, 2011

Next Solar Systems – FEDERAL GRANT 1603 – GREAT NEWS FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL

DECEMBER 21st, 2010 – The United States congress reached a compromise Thursday night, passing a major tax-cut deal including an extension of hotly-contested “Bush tax cuts”. The bill, which was signed into law over the weekend by President Obama, also included a one-year extension of the popular Federal incentive program for alternative energy projects. Solar and wind companies nationwide breathed a collective sigh of relief after the 1603 Treasury grant program was piggybacked into the overall package by the House of Representatives following intense lobbying on behalf of the renewables industry.
 
The program, which would have expired at the end of the year, covers up to 30% of the cost of renewable energy projects, which supporters claim has created over 100,000 jobs and more than $18 Billion in investments for thousands of clean generation facilities all across the United States.
“Orders will be on the rise for new wind power, and investors will put more capital into the U.S. economy,” said Denise Bode, chief executive of the American Wind Energy Association.
 
The run-up to the vote had been a nail-biting experience as developers rushed to meet the deadline in the event the extension failed to pass, said Rhone Resch, chief executive for the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA). “It was kind of a roller coaster there,” he said. “There were a lot of projects that were getting close to being canceled. Now, this gives them some flexibility to get their financing together and start construction at a time when they need it most.”
 
Industry leaders are hopeful and may see this most-recent triumph as sign of overall bipartisan support for renewable energy. As vital as the 1603 Treasury grant program has proven to be, they’re likely already looking forward to another extension next year. But for now, the one-year reprieve will do quite nicely, Resch said. “It keeps the lights on, keeps us growing,” he said. “There are a lot of happy people in the industry today, and 2011 is looking like it’ll be a true breakout year.”

Next Solar Systems Is Providing Sales Training And Consulting For Solar : http://wp.me/pUCqj-8P
 
Thank You
Element Power Group
John Krueger
818 428 5147 Cell
John@ElementControls.com
www.NextSolarSystems.com
Element Power Group Development Solutions. . .
Get Green Certified… Reduce Your Energy Costs
Commercial Energy Consultant for  Element Power Group
Hospitality | Commercial | Municipalities | Schools | Office

image 2150679992-0

December 30, 2010

Next Solar Systems – Solar Farm- Design ( SunShine States )


Next Solar Systems – Solar Farm- Design ( SunShine States )

Next Solar Systems – Solar Farm Management

* Preliminary Design

* Pre Construction Design

* Complete Construction Management And Project Management Services

Solar energy is clean, renewable and has vast potential. “If a concentrated solar power system was built that was a hundred mile by hundred mile square in size out in the Southwest (United States), which has some of the best solar resources in the entire world, or you covered 1 percent of the country’s land with photovoltaics, either strategy would be more than enough to meet the country’s entire energy demand,” Chen said. “The sky really is the limit.”

Creating solar farms to meet energy demands while avoiding concerns regarding greenhouse gas emissions “could create hundreds of thousands if not millions of jobs in the U.S.,” he added.

Another advantage of solar power is that it is usually produced during peak demand for electricity — for instance, during hot summer days when air conditioners are often full-blast. That means that value of the electricity that it produces is significantly higher, Chen explained — for example, at least 20 to 30 percent higher in California.

Photovoltaics have a slight advantage over solar thermal systems in that the latter do not require water, which can be an understandable advantage in the desert, where many solar farms are located. On the other hand, solar thermal systems can work in the shade for brief amounts of time, since the heated fluids they depend on can stay hot enough to generate electricity for some time without the sun, while photovoltaics need sunlight.

Next Solar Systems – Solar Farm Management

* Preliminary Design

* Pre Construction Design

* EPC Services – Engineering, Procurement, Construction

* Financing – Services – Options

* Project Pre – Planning Services

* Survey And Planning

* Environmental Review

* Complete Construction Management And Project Management Services

Next Solar Systems – Feds Approve Another $6 Billion For California Solar Farms : http://wp.me/pUCqj-9v

Next Solar – Race to a successful Power Purchase Agreement: http://wp.me/pUCqj-8K

Thank You
Element Power Group
John Krueger
323 727 2737 Bus
818 428 5147 Cell
John@ElementControls.com
http://www.ElementControls.com
http://www.NextSolarSystems.com

Element Power Group Development Solutions. . .

Get Green Certified… Reduce Your Energy Costs

Commercial Energy Consultant for Element Power Group

Hospitality | Commercial | Municipalities | Schools | Office

Tags: energy management, Best Solar panel, Solar, Solar electric power, USA Solar, Solar Funding, Solar Inverters, Solar Lighting, Canadian Solar, Energy Saving, Power Factor Correction, Power Quality Analysis, Solar California Churches, Energy efficiency lighting, solar and wind system, power purchase agreement, Hilco trading, Gordon Brothers, Buxbaum Group, Dow Jones, Dow Jones Solar New Jersey, Hilco Consumer Capital, commercial Solar Hawaii, solar Nonprofit Hawaii, power purchase agreement Hawaii, Well’s Fargo Bank, solar farm funding, power purchase agreement 50 states, Solar Sales

Location: SunShine States

 

December 27, 2010

Next Solar Systems – Feed In Tariff Means More Solar – Cash Back To Clients!!

 

Feed in Tariff Means More Solar

The phrase of the day is “Feed in Tariff”.

No, it is not a tax on over-eating at McDonalds.

It is a way of encouraging the use of renewable energy. Germany is most famous for this method, but it is not the only one. Read here about how our Corporation Commission might consider the issue.

Why is this important to you? Well, if you’ve ever asked “why don’t we have more solar in Arizona?”, then this is one major reason why.

There are two types of methods generally used.

1) Rebates –this is what we have now. Basically, if you install the panels, you get a rebate from the utility company (as required by the Corporation Commission).

Example: The gross cost for solar panels that I want to put on my roof is $15,000. The utility will give me a rebate of $8,000. Then I can also take various tax credits, etc. The ultimate cost will be around $7,000.

Why this is good: Its better than nothing, which is what we had.

Problems: You need to be able to come up with the initial cost (although leasing companies have made this a little better). Also, just because you install it does not mean that you will use it. Further, as the utilities are the ones who give out the rebates, they can slow the process of installation.

2) Feed in Tariff –The utility (and other rate payers) pay you for the electricity that you produce and put in to the system with renewable energy technology.

Example: My electric bill is $100 per month. But I know that every month I could generate $150 per month worth of electricity, based on current rates and what I know the utility will pay for the electricity I generate. I pocket $50 per month and get free electricity.

Why this is good: It gives investors certainty that they will get money back from their investment. It drives the installation of manufacturing for that renewable resource, but also energy efficiency (the less energy you use, the more money you pocket at the end of the month!).

Problem: Some argue that those rate-payers who don’t have solar have to absorb the cost difference of installing solar versus the cheaper coal/gas options. The important thing to keep in mind, however, is that (a) costs for solar are decreasing and (b) it will cost more if we wait and try to do it later.

So, look at this map. Who do you think would benefit if we do this the right way?

‘Nuf said….

Next Solar Systems. Your Renewable Energy Resource Professionals

* RESIDENTIAL

* COMMERCIAL

* POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT (PPA)

* SOLAR FARM & WIND

* SOLAR FARM CONSTRUCTION PLANING

Our support team shares a passion for going “green”and we are committed to helping both you and your customers with unsurpassed service.

//

Thank You
Element Power Group
John Krueger
 818 428 5147 Cell
John@ElementControls.com
www.ElementPowerGroup.com
Element Power Group Development Solutions. . .
Get Green Certified… Reduce Your Energy Costs
Commercial Energy Consultant for  Element Power Group
Hospitality | Commercial | Municipalities | Schools | Office

December 15, 2010

Next Solar Systems – California Public Utilities Commission ( Renewable Electricity Mandates Feed In Tariffs )

 

 EnergyWest News – Feed in Tariffs Renewable Electricity,  The utility would buy the excess electricity,  AweSome!!

In April, 2009, 11 United States state legislatures were considering adopting a FiT as a complement to their renewable electricity mandates.[55]

“While feed-in tariffs are most closely associated with solar photovoltaic panels, utilities managing the programs in Vermont and California will also pay a set price for electricity generated from other renewable sources, like wind.

California’s Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) program is open to homeowners who are not participating in another program, called net metering, which allows anyone whose system is producing more electricity than they need to sell the excess back to the utility, thus reducing their electric bill. But once their bill falls to zero, the homeowner gets no more money from the system.

Jon Bertolino, a spokesman for SMUD, said that customers with land to spare had been asking whether, if they put up small solar farms, the utility would buy the excess electricity.

As long as they are not part of the net-metering program and not seeking the $1.90- to $2.20-per-watt ratepayer subsidy for their new panels under the state’s “Million Solar Roofs” program, Mr. Bertolino said, small generators can sell their power to SMUD. The rates would depend on the time of day the power is generated, ranging from a low of 5 or 6 cents a kilowatt-hour to 30 cents on a hot summer afternoon; the size of eligible systems is capped at 5 megawatts (and the program overall has a 100-megawatt cap).

The Vermont law caps the size of individual systems at 2.2 megawatts. Solar energy fetches a fixed price of 30 cents a kilowatt-hour, and other forms of renewables fetch lower rates”.[77]

California

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approved a feed-in tariff on January 31, 2008 that is effective immediately.[78]

As of January 1, 2010 state laws have passed allowing homeowners who produce more than they use over the course of the year to opt in to be able to sell the excess power to the utility at a currently undisclosed rate (the rate decision has a January 1, 2011 deadline). Previously the homeowner would get no credit for over-production over the course of the year. In order to get the California Solar Initiative (CSI) rebate the customer is not allowed to install a system that inherently over-produces thereby encouraging efficiency measures to be installed after solar installation. This over-production credit is not available to certain municipal utility customers namely Los Angeles Water and Power. 

 

In April, 2009, 11 United States state legislatures were considering adopting a FiT as a complement to their renewable electricity mandates.[55]

“While feed-in tariffs are most closely associated with solar photovoltaic panels, utilities managing the programs in Vermont and California will also pay a set price for electricity generated from other renewable sources, like wind.

California’s Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) program is open to homeowners who are not participating in another program, called net metering, which allows anyone whose system is producing more electricity than they need to sell the excess back to the utility, thus reducing their electric bill. But once their bill falls to zero, the homeowner gets no more money from the system.

Jon Bertolino, a spokesman for SMUD, said that customers with land to spare had been asking whether, if they put up small solar farms, the utility would buy the excess electricity.

As long as they are not part of the net-metering program and not seeking the $1.90- to $2.20-per-watt ratepayer subsidy for their new panels under the state’s “Million Solar Roofs” program, Mr. Bertolino said, small generators can sell their power to SMUD. The rates would depend on the time of day the power is generated, ranging from a low of 5 or 6 cents a kilowatt-hour to 30 cents on a hot summer afternoon; the size of eligible systems is capped at 5 megawatts (and the program overall has a 100-megawatt cap).

The Vermont law caps the size of individual systems at 2.2 megawatts. Solar energy fetches a fixed price of 30 cents a kilowatt-hour, and other forms of renewables fetch lower rates”.[77]

California

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approved a feed-in tariff on January 31, 2008 that is effective immediately.[78]

As of January 1, 2010 state laws have passed allowing homeowners who produce more than they use over the course of the year to opt in to be able to sell the excess power to the utility at a currently undisclosed rate (the rate decision has a January 1, 2011 deadline). Previously the homeowner would get no credit for over-production over the course of the year. In order to get the California Solar Initiative (CSI) rebate the customer is not allowed to install a system that inherently over-produces thereby encouraging efficiency measures to be installed after solar installation. This over-production credit is not available to certain municipal utility customers namely Los Angeles Water and Power.

Next Solar Systems – Solar Farm Management

 *  EPC Services – Engineering, Procurement, Construction

 * Financing – Services – Options

 * Project Pre – Planning Services

 * Complete Construction Management And Project Management Services

Next Solar Systems – Feds Approve Another $6 Billion For California Solar Farms : http://wp.me/pUCqj-9v

AB 920: The California Solar Surplus Act of 2009 : http://wp.me/pUCqj-8Y

 

Thank You
Element Power Group
John Krueger
323 727 2737 Bus
John@ElementControls.com
www.ElementControls.com

Element Power Group Development Solutions. . .
Get Green Certified… Reduce Your Energy Costs
Commercial Energy Consultant for  Element Power Group
Hospitality | Commercial | Municipalities | Schools | Office
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Next Page »

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.